Notizen 10.6.2024

20240610/nit-20240610.txt

@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ cassini/home/peter/bo/2024ss/nit/20240610> cowsay "Aufgabe: Worin unterscheidet
                 ||----w |
                 ||     ||
 
-
-
 Model: ChatGPT 4o
 
 Prompt: Was ist der Unterschied zwischen der GPL und der L-GPL und der A-GPL?
@@ -100,10 +98,83 @@ Ergebnis:
 ⁴: Dies ist nicht falsch, aber es suggeriert implizit, daß das
    Verlinken mit proprietärer Software ein wünschenswertes Ziel sei.
 
+Creative-Commons-Lizenzen:
+
+ - Nicht alle CC-Lizenzen sind frei (Open Source)!
+   Es gibt auch welche, die nur nichtkommerzielle Nutzung erlauben.
+
+ - Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA):
+   Copyleft, nicht spezialisiert auf Software
+   Attribution = Namensnennung erforderlich
+
+ - Creative Commons Attributon (CC BY):
+   kein Copyleft, freizügige Lizenz
+
+ - Creative Commons Zero (CC0):
+   "public domain", soweit gesetzlich zulässig
+
+Die Original-BSD-Lizenz:
+
+  Copyright (c) 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All
+  rights reserved.
+
+  This software was developed by ¹ the Computer Systems Engineering group
+  at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory under DARPA contract BG 91-66 and
+  contributed to Berkeley.
+
+  All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
+  must display the following acknowledgement: This product includes
+  software developed by ¹ the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley
+  Laboratory.
+
+  Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+  modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+  met:
+
+      1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+      notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+
+      2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
+      notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
+      the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+      distribution.
+
+      3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
+      software must display the following acknowledgement: This product
+      includes software developed by ¹ the University of California,
+      Berkeley and its contributors.
+
+      4. Neither the name of ¹ the University nor the names of its
+      contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
+      from this software without specific prior written permission.
+
+  THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS''
+  AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
+  THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
+  PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS
+  BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
+  CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
+  SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR
+  BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY,
+  WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE
+  OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN
+  IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. 
+
+¹: Hier ggf. den eigenen Namen hinschreiben, wenn man diese Lizenz
+   für eigene Software verwenden will.
+
+Bedingung 3 ist problematisch. Während der Weiterentwicklung der Software
+werden sich hier viele Namen anhäufen. Jede Werbung für ein Produkt, das
+die Software nutzt, muß dann alle Namen auflisten. Dies ist inpraktikabel.
+
+Die modifizierte BSD-Lizenz:
+
+  Dasselbe, aber ohne Bedingung 3.
+
 Weitere Lizenzen:
- - CC BY-SA: Copyleft, nicht spezialisiert auf Software
+
+ - MIT-Lizenz: freizügige Lizenzen
  - MPL: Teil-Copyleft
- - BSD-Lizenzen und MIT-Lizenz: freizügige Lizenzen
  - Apache-Lizenz: freizügige Lizenz, Patent-Klausel
 
 Software-Patente